Individuals Group founder and Shark Tank India decide Anupam Mittal mentioned AI is unlikely to interchange people anytime quickly, arguing that the true marvel lies not in intelligence itself however within the complexity and effectivity of the human mind.

In a post on LinkedIn, Mittal mentioned replicating the capabilities of a single human mind utilizing at present’s AI approaches would require computing infrastructure on the dimensions of a football-field-sized knowledge middle, working at full capability, merely to imitate how one individual sees, thinks, learns and makes selections in actual time.

In contrast, he famous, the human mind performs these features utilizing roughly 20 watts of energy.

“To match a single human mind utilizing at present’s AI approaches, you’d want one thing near a football-field-sized knowledge centre operating flat out – simply to imitate how one individual sees, thinks, learns, and decides in actual time…All that to copy what your mind does on 20 watts,” Mittal wrote.

Mittal added that makes an attempt to biologically replicate the mind, together with neurons, synapses, chemistry and plasticit, transfer far past typical computing fashions.

Whereas such replication could also be theoretically attainable, he mentioned it might require computing energy on a planetary scale.

He mentioned artificial intelligence excels at automation, repetition and large-scale sample recognition, however lacks key human attributes resembling judgment, creativity, contextual understanding and realizing when to not act. These qualities, he argued, are emergent properties formed over hundreds of thousands of years of evolution and can’t be lowered to extra parameters or bigger fashions.

Till there’s a elementary shift in how intelligence is computed, moderately than incremental advances via bigger fashions and extra processing energy, Mittal mentioned the substitute of human creativity by AI just isn’t a near-term risk.

“The actual miracle of the mind isn’t intelligence. It’s all of the complexity that matches inside your cranium, runs on sugar and oxygen, and dissipates much less warmth than a lightweight bulb. That’s the human flex AI can’t replicate,” he added.

Netizens response

Mittal’s put up shortly sparked a dialogue, with professionals from expertise, regulation, knowledge science and entrepreneurship weighing in, largely agreeing along with his central thesis, whereas including their very own nuances.

“The actual query is not substitute, it is augmentation. From my expertise constructing automation methods at Wellness Extract, AI does not eradicate jobs—it evolves them,” a person wrote.

“Properly defined, particularly the energy-efficiency hole of the human mind. One thought although — AI might not want to copy your entire human mind to interchange people in lots of financial roles. Historical past reveals that partial automation typically displaces outcomes with out matching biology (calculators vs mathematicians, planes vs birds),” one other famous.

“I agree we won’t obtain by AI what People can do with simply 20W however I do not assume that it requires a earth sized pc,” a 3rd expressed.

“Insightful framing. One nuance although: AI doesn’t want to copy the human mind to interchange people functionally. Disruption traditionally occurs by redefining duties and economics, not by organic imitation. The actual query isn’t consciousness, it’s how a lot human presence stays crucial within the loop,” one other added.